AAP Leader Manish Sisodia's Curative Petitions in the Excise Policy Scam are rejected by the Supreme Court

Recently, the Supreme Court of India has rejected the curative petitions filed by Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Manish Sisodia in relation to the Excise Policy Scam. This decision comes as a major blow to Sisodia, who has been fighting legal battles for years to clear his name in this high-profile case.

The Background of the Excise Policy Scam

The Excise Policy Scam is a corruption scandal that dates back to 2015 when allegations surfaced that senior officials in the Delhi government were involved in a conspiracy to manipulate excise policies for personal gain. Manish Sisodia, who was serving as the Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi at the time, was also implicated in the scandal.

Despite denying any wrongdoing, Sisodia has been under intense scrutiny and legal proceedings ever since the scandal broke out. He has maintained his innocence throughout the investigations and court hearings, claiming that he was not involved in any illegal activities related to the excise policies.

The Rejection of Curative Petitions by SC

In a recent hearing, the Supreme Court rejected Manish Sisodia’s curative petitions challenging his conviction in connection with the Excise Policy Scam. The court found no merit in his arguments and upheld its earlier decisions regarding his involvement in the scandal.

This ruling by the Supreme Court is a significant setback for Sisodia and his legal team, who have been tirelessly fighting to overturn his conviction and clear his name. Despite their efforts, it appears that the highest judicial authority in India has decided against granting him relief in this matter.

The Impact on AAP Leader Manish Sisodia

With the rejection of his curative petitions, Manish Sisodia now faces an uncertain future as he grapples with the fallout from this latest setback. The decision by the Supreme Court casts a shadow over his political career and reputation, raising questions about his credibility and integrity as a public servant.

Sisodia’s supporters have expressed disappointment and frustration over this development, while his critics have seized upon it as further proof of his alleged involvement in corrupt practices. The AAP leader will need to navigate these challenges carefully as he seeks to salvage his image and credibility among voters and party members.


In conclusion, the rejection of AAP leader Manish Sisodia’s curative petitions by the Supreme Court highlights the ongoing legal battles surrounding the Excise Policy Scam. Despite his persistent efforts to clear his name and prove his innocence, it seems that he has not been able to convince the courts of his non-involvement in this corruption scandal.

It remains to be seen how Manish Sisodia will respond to this latest setback and what implications it will have on his political career going forward.